Head-to-Head Analysis

Keebler, sandies, classic shortbread cookies vs Peach Rings

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Keebler, sandies, classic shortbread cookies

Keebler, sandies, classic shortbread cookies

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Peach Rings

Peach Rings

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
516 kcal
Energy
137 kcal
22.6g
Sugars
2g
29g
Fat
0g
6.5g
Protein
0g
0.7g
Salt
0.5g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Keebler, sandies, classic shortbread cookies and Peach Rings side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Keebler, sandies, classic shortbread cookies is the more energy-dense option here, packing 379 more calories per 100g than Peach Rings. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Keebler, sandies, classic shortbread cookies contains significantly more sugar (22.6g) compared to the milder Peach Rings (1.96g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Peach Rings is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Keebler, sandies, classic shortbread cookies offers a protein boost with 6.45g per 100g, outperforming Peach Rings in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Keebler, sandies, classic shortbread cookies or Peach Rings?

It depends on your goals. Keebler, sandies, classic shortbread cookies has 516 calories, while Peach Rings has 137 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Keebler, sandies, classic shortbread cookies vegan?

No, Keebler, sandies, classic shortbread cookies is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Keebler, sandies, classic shortbread cookies and Peach Rings?

There is a difference of 379 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.