Head-to-Head Analysis

Kellog's Nutrigrain Raspberry vs Cotton Candy Monster Breath

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Kellog's Nutrigrain Raspberry

Kellog's Nutrigrain Raspberry

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Cotton Candy Monster Breath

Cotton Candy Monster Breath

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
351 kcal
Energy
0 kcal
32.4g
Sugars
0g
9.5g
Fat
0g
5.4g
Protein
0g
0.8g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Kellog's Nutrigrain Raspberry and Cotton Candy Monster Breath side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Kellog's Nutrigrain Raspberry is the more energy-dense option here, packing 351 more calories per 100g than Cotton Candy Monster Breath. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Kellog's Nutrigrain Raspberry contains significantly more sugar (32.4g) compared to the milder Cotton Candy Monster Breath (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Cotton Candy Monster Breath is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Kellog's Nutrigrain Raspberry offers a protein boost with 5.41g per 100g, outperforming Cotton Candy Monster Breath in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Kellog's Nutrigrain Raspberry or Cotton Candy Monster Breath?

It depends on your goals. Kellog's Nutrigrain Raspberry has 351 calories, while Cotton Candy Monster Breath has 0 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Kellog's Nutrigrain Raspberry vegan?

No, Kellog's Nutrigrain Raspberry is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Kellog's Nutrigrain Raspberry and Cotton Candy Monster Breath?

There is a difference of 351 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.