Head-to-Head Analysis

Kellogg's All-Bran Original imp vs Oat Bran & Stone Ground Whole Wheat Flour

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Kellogg's All-Bran Original imp

Kellogg's All-Bran Original imp

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Oat Bran & Stone Ground Whole Wheat Flour

Oat Bran & Stone Ground Whole Wheat Flour

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
293 kcal
Energy
175 kcal
22g
Sugars
0g
4.9g
Fat
5g
12.2g
Protein
15g
0.6g
Salt
2g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Kellogg's All-Bran Original imp and Oat Bran & Stone Ground Whole Wheat Flour side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Kellogg's All-Bran Original imp is the more energy-dense option here, packing 118 more calories per 100g than Oat Bran & Stone Ground Whole Wheat Flour. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Kellogg's All-Bran Original imp contains significantly more sugar (22g) compared to the milder Oat Bran & Stone Ground Whole Wheat Flour (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Oat Bran & Stone Ground Whole Wheat Flour is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Kellogg's All-Bran Original imp or Oat Bran & Stone Ground Whole Wheat Flour?

It depends on your goals. Kellogg's All-Bran Original imp has 293 calories, while Oat Bran & Stone Ground Whole Wheat Flour has 175 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Kellogg's All-Bran Original imp vegan?

No, Kellogg's All-Bran Original imp is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Kellogg's All-Bran Original imp and Oat Bran & Stone Ground Whole Wheat Flour?

There is a difference of 118 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.