Head-to-Head Analysis

Kellogg’s Extra Crispy Clusters Cinnamon vs Dum dums original

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Kellogg’s Extra Crispy Clusters Cinnamon

Kellogg’s Extra Crispy Clusters Cinnamon

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Dum dums original

Dum dums original

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
424.2 kcal
Energy
400 kcal
19.7g
Sugars
66.7g
16.7g
Fat
0g
7.6g
Protein
0g
0g
Salt
0.2g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Kellogg’s Extra Crispy Clusters Cinnamon and Dum dums original side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Kellogg’s Extra Crispy Clusters Cinnamon is the more energy-dense option here, packing 24 more calories per 100g than Dum dums original. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

In terms of sugar control, Kellogg’s Extra Crispy Clusters Cinnamon takes the lead with only 19.6969696969697g of sugar per 100g, whereas Dum dums original contains 66.666666666667g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? Kellogg’s Extra Crispy Clusters Cinnamon offers a protein boost with 7.57575757575758g per 100g, outperforming Dum dums original in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Kellogg’s Extra Crispy Clusters Cinnamon or Dum dums original?

It depends on your goals. Kellogg’s Extra Crispy Clusters Cinnamon has 424.242424242424 calories, while Dum dums original has 400 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Kellogg’s Extra Crispy Clusters Cinnamon vegan?

No, Kellogg’s Extra Crispy Clusters Cinnamon is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Kellogg’s Extra Crispy Clusters Cinnamon and Dum dums original?

There is a difference of 24 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.