Head-to-Head Analysis

Kettle cooked potato chips vs peanut butter smooth unsalted

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Kettle cooked potato chips

Kettle cooked potato chips

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of peanut butter smooth unsalted

peanut butter smooth unsalted

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
535.7 kcal
Energy
0 kcal
3.6g
Sugars
0g
32.1g
Fat
0g
7.1g
Protein
0g
1g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Kettle cooked potato chips and peanut butter smooth unsalted side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Kettle cooked potato chips is the more energy-dense option here, packing 536 more calories per 100g than peanut butter smooth unsalted. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Kettle cooked potato chips contains significantly more sugar (3.5714285714286g) compared to the milder peanut butter smooth unsalted (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, peanut butter smooth unsalted is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Kettle cooked potato chips offers a protein boost with 7.1428571428571g per 100g, outperforming peanut butter smooth unsalted in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Kettle cooked potato chips or peanut butter smooth unsalted?

It depends on your goals. Kettle cooked potato chips has 535.71428571429 calories, while peanut butter smooth unsalted has 0 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Kettle cooked potato chips vegan?

No, Kettle cooked potato chips is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Kettle cooked potato chips and peanut butter smooth unsalted?

There is a difference of 536 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.