Head-to-Head Analysis

Kids Spinach Littles vs Vegetables for Roasting Sweet Potato, Cauliflower, Brussels Sprouts

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Kids Spinach Littles

Kids Spinach Littles

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Vegetables for Roasting Sweet Potato, Cauliflower, Brussels Sprouts

Vegetables for Roasting Sweet Potato, Cauliflower, Brussels Sprouts

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
165 kcal
Energy
51 kcal
0g
Sugars
3.1g
9.4g
Fat
0g
3.5g
Protein
2g
0.8g
Salt
0.1g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Kids Spinach Littles and Vegetables for Roasting Sweet Potato, Cauliflower, Brussels Sprouts side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Kids Spinach Littles is the more energy-dense option here, packing 114 more calories per 100g than Vegetables for Roasting Sweet Potato, Cauliflower, Brussels Sprouts. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

In terms of sugar control, Kids Spinach Littles takes the lead with only 0g of sugar per 100g, whereas Vegetables for Roasting Sweet Potato, Cauliflower, Brussels Sprouts contains 3.06g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Kids Spinach Littles or Vegetables for Roasting Sweet Potato, Cauliflower, Brussels Sprouts?

It depends on your goals. Kids Spinach Littles has 165 calories, while Vegetables for Roasting Sweet Potato, Cauliflower, Brussels Sprouts has 51 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Kids Spinach Littles vegan?

No, Kids Spinach Littles is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Kids Spinach Littles and Vegetables for Roasting Sweet Potato, Cauliflower, Brussels Sprouts?

There is a difference of 114 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.