Head-to-Head Analysis

Kids Sweet Potato Littles vs ORIGINAL CHIK'N PATTIES

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Kids Sweet Potato Littles

Kids Sweet Potato Littles

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of ORIGINAL CHIK'N PATTIES

ORIGINAL CHIK'N PATTIES

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
200 kcal
Energy
225 kcal
11.8g
Sugars
2.8g
8.2g
Fat
9.9g
2.4g
Protein
12.7g
0.6g
Salt
1.3g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Kids Sweet Potato Littles and ORIGINAL CHIK'N PATTIES side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Kids Sweet Potato Littles is the clear winner. With 25 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Kids Sweet Potato Littles contains significantly more sugar (11.8g) compared to the milder ORIGINAL CHIK'N PATTIES (2.82g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, ORIGINAL CHIK'N PATTIES is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Kids Sweet Potato Littles or ORIGINAL CHIK'N PATTIES?

It depends on your goals. Kids Sweet Potato Littles has 200 calories, while ORIGINAL CHIK'N PATTIES has 225 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Kids Sweet Potato Littles vegan?

No, Kids Sweet Potato Littles is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Kids Sweet Potato Littles and ORIGINAL CHIK'N PATTIES?

There is a difference of 25 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.