Head-to-Head Analysis

Kim vs Ultimate Plant-Based Chick'n Filets

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Kim

Kim

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Ultimate Plant-Based Chick'n Filets

Ultimate Plant-Based Chick'n Filets

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
182 kcal
Energy
211 kcal
2.6g
Sugars
0.7g
5.2g
Fat
9.2g
5.2g
Protein
16.9g
1g
Salt
1.6g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Kim and Ultimate Plant-Based Chick'n Filets side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Kim is the clear winner. With 29 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Kim contains significantly more sugar (2.6g) compared to the milder Ultimate Plant-Based Chick'n Filets (0.704g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Ultimate Plant-Based Chick'n Filets is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Kim or Ultimate Plant-Based Chick'n Filets?

It depends on your goals. Kim has 182 calories, while Ultimate Plant-Based Chick'n Filets has 211 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Kim vegan?

No, Kim is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Kim and Ultimate Plant-Based Chick'n Filets?

There is a difference of 29 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.