Head-to-Head Analysis

kim chi vs Sweet whole pickles

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of kim chi

kim chi

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Sweet whole pickles

Sweet whole pickles

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
53.6 kcal
Energy
143 kcal
3.6g
Sugars
35.7g
0g
Fat
0g
3.6g
Protein
0g
1.8g
Salt
2g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing kim chi and Sweet whole pickles side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, kim chi is the clear winner. With 89 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

In terms of sugar control, kim chi takes the lead with only 3.57g of sugar per 100g, whereas Sweet whole pickles contains 35.71g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? kim chi offers a protein boost with 3.57g per 100g, outperforming Sweet whole pickles in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: kim chi or Sweet whole pickles?

kim chi appears to be the healthier option generally, as it has less sugar and fewer calories.

Is kim chi vegan?

No, kim chi is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between kim chi and Sweet whole pickles?

There is a difference of 89 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.