Head-to-Head Analysis

Kind dark chocolate nut vs Hi chew superfruit mix flavored fruit chews

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Kind dark chocolate nut

Kind dark chocolate nut

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Hi chew superfruit mix flavored fruit chews

Hi chew superfruit mix flavored fruit chews

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
480 kcal
Energy
419.4 kcal
16g
Sugars
61.3g
34g
Fat
9.7g
24g
Protein
0g
0.6g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Kind dark chocolate nut and Hi chew superfruit mix flavored fruit chews side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Kind dark chocolate nut is the more energy-dense option here, packing 61 more calories per 100g than Hi chew superfruit mix flavored fruit chews. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

In terms of sugar control, Kind dark chocolate nut takes the lead with only 16g of sugar per 100g, whereas Hi chew superfruit mix flavored fruit chews contains 61.2903g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? Kind dark chocolate nut offers a protein boost with 24g per 100g, outperforming Hi chew superfruit mix flavored fruit chews in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Kind dark chocolate nut or Hi chew superfruit mix flavored fruit chews?

It depends on your goals. Kind dark chocolate nut has 480 calories, while Hi chew superfruit mix flavored fruit chews has 419.3548 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Kind dark chocolate nut vegan?

No, Kind dark chocolate nut is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Kind dark chocolate nut and Hi chew superfruit mix flavored fruit chews?

There is a difference of 61 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.