Head-to-Head Analysis

Kirin vs fresh stacks the original

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Kirin

Kirin

Not Vegan
VS
Package of fresh stacks the original

fresh stacks the original

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
43.5 kcal
Energy
500 kcal
0g
Sugars
6.3g
0g
Fat
28.1g
0g
Protein
3.1g
0g
Salt
2g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Kirin and fresh stacks the original side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Kirin is the clear winner. With 456 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

In terms of sugar control, Kirin takes the lead with only 0g of sugar per 100g, whereas fresh stacks the original contains 6.25g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Kirin or fresh stacks the original?

Kirin appears to be the healthier option generally, as it has less sugar and fewer calories.

Is Kirin vegan?

No, Kirin is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Kirin and fresh stacks the original?

There is a difference of 456 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.