Head-to-Head Analysis

Kirkland 1/4 Pound Beef Franks vs Fruit Roll-Ups Blastin' Berry Hot Colors 10 Count

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Kirkland 1/4 Pound Beef Franks

Kirkland 1/4 Pound Beef Franks

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Fruit Roll-Ups Blastin' Berry Hot Colors 10 Count

Fruit Roll-Ups Blastin' Berry Hot Colors 10 Count

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
301 kcal
Energy
357 kcal
2.4g
Sugars
50g
25.2g
Fat
7.1g
13g
Protein
0g
2.5g
Salt
0.9g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Kirkland 1/4 Pound Beef Franks and Fruit Roll-Ups Blastin' Berry Hot Colors 10 Count side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Kirkland 1/4 Pound Beef Franks is the clear winner. With 56 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

In terms of sugar control, Kirkland 1/4 Pound Beef Franks takes the lead with only 2.44g of sugar per 100g, whereas Fruit Roll-Ups Blastin' Berry Hot Colors 10 Count contains 50g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? Kirkland 1/4 Pound Beef Franks offers a protein boost with 13g per 100g, outperforming Fruit Roll-Ups Blastin' Berry Hot Colors 10 Count in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Kirkland 1/4 Pound Beef Franks or Fruit Roll-Ups Blastin' Berry Hot Colors 10 Count?

Kirkland 1/4 Pound Beef Franks appears to be the healthier option generally, as it has less sugar and fewer calories.

Is Kirkland 1/4 Pound Beef Franks vegan?

No, Kirkland 1/4 Pound Beef Franks is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Kirkland 1/4 Pound Beef Franks and Fruit Roll-Ups Blastin' Berry Hot Colors 10 Count?

There is a difference of 56 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.