Head-to-Head Analysis

Kirkland albacore solid white tuna in water of cans vs Yellowfin Tuna

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Kirkland albacore solid white tuna in water of cans

Kirkland albacore solid white tuna in water of cans

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Yellowfin Tuna

Yellowfin Tuna

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
137 kcal
Energy
129 kcal
0g
Sugars
0g
2.6g
Fat
0.6g
28.1g
Protein
30.6g
0.8g
Salt
0.6g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Kirkland albacore solid white tuna in water of cans and Yellowfin Tuna side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Kirkland albacore solid white tuna in water of cans is the more energy-dense option here, packing 8 more calories per 100g than Yellowfin Tuna. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Kirkland albacore solid white tuna in water of cans or Yellowfin Tuna?

It depends on your goals. Kirkland albacore solid white tuna in water of cans has 137 calories, while Yellowfin Tuna has 129 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Kirkland albacore solid white tuna in water of cans vegan?

No, Kirkland albacore solid white tuna in water of cans is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Kirkland albacore solid white tuna in water of cans and Yellowfin Tuna?

There is a difference of 8 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.