Head-to-Head Analysis

Kirkland Chicken Sandwich w/Sauce vs Multi-grain tortilla chips

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Kirkland Chicken Sandwich w/Sauce

Kirkland Chicken Sandwich w/Sauce

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Multi-grain tortilla chips

Multi-grain tortilla chips

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
234 kcal
Energy
464 kcal
2.3g
Sugars
0g
15.3g
Fat
25g
10.7g
Protein
7.1g
0g
Salt
0.8g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Kirkland Chicken Sandwich w/Sauce and Multi-grain tortilla chips side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Kirkland Chicken Sandwich w/Sauce is the clear winner. With 230 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Kirkland Chicken Sandwich w/Sauce contains significantly more sugar (2.3g) compared to the milder Multi-grain tortilla chips (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Multi-grain tortilla chips is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Kirkland Chicken Sandwich w/Sauce offers a protein boost with 10.7g per 100g, outperforming Multi-grain tortilla chips in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Kirkland Chicken Sandwich w/Sauce or Multi-grain tortilla chips?

It depends on your goals. Kirkland Chicken Sandwich w/Sauce has 234 calories, while Multi-grain tortilla chips has 464 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Kirkland Chicken Sandwich w/Sauce vegan?

No, Kirkland Chicken Sandwich w/Sauce is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Kirkland Chicken Sandwich w/Sauce and Multi-grain tortilla chips?

There is a difference of 230 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.