Head-to-Head Analysis

Kirkland Chicken Thigh vs Honey Apple soft baked bars

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Kirkland Chicken Thigh

Kirkland Chicken Thigh

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Honey Apple soft baked bars

Honey Apple soft baked bars

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
143 kcal
Energy
408.5 kcal
0.9g
Sugars
26g
8g
Fat
18.6g
17g
Protein
7.4g
0.1g
Salt
0.5g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Kirkland Chicken Thigh and Honey Apple soft baked bars side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Kirkland Chicken Thigh is the clear winner. With 265 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

In terms of sugar control, Kirkland Chicken Thigh takes the lead with only 0.893g of sugar per 100g, whereas Honey Apple soft baked bars contains 25.993316004456g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? Kirkland Chicken Thigh offers a protein boost with 17g per 100g, outperforming Honey Apple soft baked bars in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Kirkland Chicken Thigh or Honey Apple soft baked bars?

Kirkland Chicken Thigh appears to be the healthier option generally, as it has less sugar and fewer calories.

Is Kirkland Chicken Thigh vegan?

No, Kirkland Chicken Thigh is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Kirkland Chicken Thigh and Honey Apple soft baked bars?

There is a difference of 265 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.