Kirkland Ground Beef vs Little chicks milk chocolate
Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.
Kirkland Ground Beef
Little chicks milk chocolate
The Verdict: Which is Better?
When placing Kirkland Ground Beef and Little chicks milk chocolate side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.
For calorie-conscious consumers, Kirkland Ground Beef is the clear winner. With 392 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.
In terms of sugar control, Kirkland Ground Beef takes the lead with only 0g of sugar per 100g, whereas Little chicks milk chocolate contains 50g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.
Looking to build muscle? Kirkland Ground Beef offers a protein boost with 19.6g per 100g, outperforming Little chicks milk chocolate in this category.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is healthier: Kirkland Ground Beef or Little chicks milk chocolate?
Kirkland Ground Beef appears to be the healthier option generally, as it has less sugar and fewer calories.
Is Kirkland Ground Beef vegan?
No, Kirkland Ground Beef is not certified vegan.
What is the calorie difference between Kirkland Ground Beef and Little chicks milk chocolate?
There is a difference of 392 calories per 100g between the two products.
