Head-to-Head Analysis

Kirkland Pink Salt vs Wafers

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Kirkland Pink Salt

Kirkland Pink Salt

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Wafers

Wafers

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
0 kcal
Energy
0 kcal
0g
Sugars
3g
0g
Fat
28g
0g
Protein
7.1g
95.8g
Salt
1.5g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Kirkland Pink Salt and Wafers side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Kirkland Pink Salt is the more energy-dense option here, packing 0 more calories per 100g than Wafers. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

In terms of sugar control, Kirkland Pink Salt takes the lead with only 0g of sugar per 100g, whereas Wafers contains 3g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Kirkland Pink Salt or Wafers?

It depends on your goals. Kirkland Pink Salt has 0 calories, while Wafers has 0 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Kirkland Pink Salt vegan?

No, Kirkland Pink Salt is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Kirkland Pink Salt and Wafers?

There is a difference of 0 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.