Head-to-Head Analysis

Kirkland Signature Boneless Skinless Chicken Thighs vs Applesauce

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Kirkland Signature Boneless Skinless Chicken Thighs

Kirkland Signature Boneless Skinless Chicken Thighs

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Applesauce

Applesauce

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
143 kcal
Energy
41 kcal
0.9g
Sugars
9g
8g
Fat
0g
17g
Protein
0g
0.1g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Kirkland Signature Boneless Skinless Chicken Thighs and Applesauce side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Kirkland Signature Boneless Skinless Chicken Thighs is the more energy-dense option here, packing 102 more calories per 100g than Applesauce. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

In terms of sugar control, Kirkland Signature Boneless Skinless Chicken Thighs takes the lead with only 0.893g of sugar per 100g, whereas Applesauce contains 9.02g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? Kirkland Signature Boneless Skinless Chicken Thighs offers a protein boost with 17g per 100g, outperforming Applesauce in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Kirkland Signature Boneless Skinless Chicken Thighs or Applesauce?

It depends on your goals. Kirkland Signature Boneless Skinless Chicken Thighs has 143 calories, while Applesauce has 41 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Kirkland Signature Boneless Skinless Chicken Thighs vegan?

No, Kirkland Signature Boneless Skinless Chicken Thighs is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Kirkland Signature Boneless Skinless Chicken Thighs and Applesauce?

There is a difference of 102 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.