Kirkland Signature Chicken Thighs vs Coconut macaroons, coconut
Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.
Kirkland Signature Chicken Thighs
Coconut macaroons, coconut
The Verdict: Which is Better?
When placing Kirkland Signature Chicken Thighs and Coconut macaroons, coconut side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.
For calorie-conscious consumers, Kirkland Signature Chicken Thighs is the clear winner. With 263 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.
In terms of sugar control, Kirkland Signature Chicken Thighs takes the lead with only 0.893g of sugar per 100g, whereas Coconut macaroons, coconut contains 40.62g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.
Looking to build muscle? Kirkland Signature Chicken Thighs offers a protein boost with 17g per 100g, outperforming Coconut macaroons, coconut in this category.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is healthier: Kirkland Signature Chicken Thighs or Coconut macaroons, coconut?
Kirkland Signature Chicken Thighs appears to be the healthier option generally, as it has less sugar and fewer calories.
Is Kirkland Signature Chicken Thighs vegan?
No, Kirkland Signature Chicken Thighs is not certified vegan.
What is the calorie difference between Kirkland Signature Chicken Thighs and Coconut macaroons, coconut?
There is a difference of 263 calories per 100g between the two products.
