Head-to-Head Analysis

Kirkland Signature Chicken Thighs vs Nutter Butter Peanut Butter Sandwich Cookies

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Kirkland Signature Chicken Thighs

Kirkland Signature Chicken Thighs

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Nutter Butter Peanut Butter Sandwich Cookies

Nutter Butter Peanut Butter Sandwich Cookies

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
143 kcal
Energy
464 kcal
0.9g
Sugars
28.6g
8g
Fat
19.6g
17g
Protein
7.1g
0.1g
Salt
0.9g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Kirkland Signature Chicken Thighs and Nutter Butter Peanut Butter Sandwich Cookies side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Kirkland Signature Chicken Thighs is the clear winner. With 321 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

In terms of sugar control, Kirkland Signature Chicken Thighs takes the lead with only 0.893g of sugar per 100g, whereas Nutter Butter Peanut Butter Sandwich Cookies contains 28.6g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? Kirkland Signature Chicken Thighs offers a protein boost with 17g per 100g, outperforming Nutter Butter Peanut Butter Sandwich Cookies in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Kirkland Signature Chicken Thighs or Nutter Butter Peanut Butter Sandwich Cookies?

Kirkland Signature Chicken Thighs appears to be the healthier option generally, as it has less sugar and fewer calories.

Is Kirkland Signature Chicken Thighs vegan?

No, Kirkland Signature Chicken Thighs is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Kirkland Signature Chicken Thighs and Nutter Butter Peanut Butter Sandwich Cookies?

There is a difference of 321 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.