Head-to-Head Analysis

Kirkland Signature Gourmet Chocolate Chunk Cookies vs Simply Better Chocolate

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Kirkland Signature Gourmet Chocolate Chunk Cookies

Kirkland Signature Gourmet Chocolate Chunk Cookies

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Simply Better Chocolate

Simply Better Chocolate

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
500 kcal
Energy
571 kcal
38.1g
Sugars
21.4g
26.2g
Fat
42.9g
7.1g
Protein
7.1g
0.7g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Kirkland Signature Gourmet Chocolate Chunk Cookies and Simply Better Chocolate side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Kirkland Signature Gourmet Chocolate Chunk Cookies is the clear winner. With 71 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Kirkland Signature Gourmet Chocolate Chunk Cookies contains significantly more sugar (38.1g) compared to the milder Simply Better Chocolate (21.4g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Simply Better Chocolate is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Kirkland Signature Gourmet Chocolate Chunk Cookies or Simply Better Chocolate?

It depends on your goals. Kirkland Signature Gourmet Chocolate Chunk Cookies has 500 calories, while Simply Better Chocolate has 571 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Kirkland Signature Gourmet Chocolate Chunk Cookies vegan?

No, Kirkland Signature Gourmet Chocolate Chunk Cookies is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Kirkland Signature Gourmet Chocolate Chunk Cookies and Simply Better Chocolate?

There is a difference of 71 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.