Kirkland Skinless Boneless Chicken Thighs vs Whole natural almonds
Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.
Kirkland Skinless Boneless Chicken Thighs
Whole natural almonds
The Verdict: Which is Better?
When placing Kirkland Skinless Boneless Chicken Thighs and Whole natural almonds side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.
For calorie-conscious consumers, Kirkland Skinless Boneless Chicken Thighs is the clear winner. With 428 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.
In terms of sugar control, Kirkland Skinless Boneless Chicken Thighs takes the lead with only 0.893g of sugar per 100g, whereas Whole natural almonds contains 3.57g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is healthier: Kirkland Skinless Boneless Chicken Thighs or Whole natural almonds?
Kirkland Skinless Boneless Chicken Thighs appears to be the healthier option generally, as it has less sugar and fewer calories.
Is Kirkland Skinless Boneless Chicken Thighs vegan?
No, Kirkland Skinless Boneless Chicken Thighs is not certified vegan.
What is the calorie difference between Kirkland Skinless Boneless Chicken Thighs and Whole natural almonds?
There is a difference of 428 calories per 100g between the two products.
