Head-to-Head Analysis

Kirkland Smoked Pork Back Ribs vs Scalloped Crackers Sea Salt

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Kirkland Smoked Pork Back Ribs

Kirkland Smoked Pork Back Ribs

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Scalloped Crackers Sea Salt

Scalloped Crackers Sea Salt

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
298 kcal
Energy
412 kcal
7.1g
Sugars
0g
20.2g
Fat
20.6g
20.2g
Protein
0g
1.4g
Salt
0.9g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Kirkland Smoked Pork Back Ribs and Scalloped Crackers Sea Salt side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Kirkland Smoked Pork Back Ribs is the clear winner. With 114 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Kirkland Smoked Pork Back Ribs contains significantly more sugar (7.14g) compared to the milder Scalloped Crackers Sea Salt (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Scalloped Crackers Sea Salt is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Kirkland Smoked Pork Back Ribs offers a protein boost with 20.2g per 100g, outperforming Scalloped Crackers Sea Salt in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Kirkland Smoked Pork Back Ribs or Scalloped Crackers Sea Salt?

It depends on your goals. Kirkland Smoked Pork Back Ribs has 298 calories, while Scalloped Crackers Sea Salt has 412 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Kirkland Smoked Pork Back Ribs vegan?

No, Kirkland Smoked Pork Back Ribs is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Kirkland Smoked Pork Back Ribs and Scalloped Crackers Sea Salt?

There is a difference of 114 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.