Head-to-Head Analysis

Koku Uma Tamago Sando vs Black Olives Pitted

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Koku Uma Tamago Sando

Koku Uma Tamago Sando

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Black Olives Pitted

Black Olives Pitted

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
413 kcal
Energy
142.9 kcal
21.7g
Sugars
0g
31.8g
Fat
7.1g
9g
Protein
0g
0g
Salt
2.3g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Koku Uma Tamago Sando and Black Olives Pitted side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Koku Uma Tamago Sando is the more energy-dense option here, packing 270 more calories per 100g than Black Olives Pitted. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Koku Uma Tamago Sando contains significantly more sugar (21.7g) compared to the milder Black Olives Pitted (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Black Olives Pitted is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Koku Uma Tamago Sando offers a protein boost with 9g per 100g, outperforming Black Olives Pitted in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Koku Uma Tamago Sando or Black Olives Pitted?

It depends on your goals. Koku Uma Tamago Sando has 413 calories, while Black Olives Pitted has 142.857142857143 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Koku Uma Tamago Sando vegan?

No, Koku Uma Tamago Sando is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Koku Uma Tamago Sando and Black Olives Pitted?

There is a difference of 270 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.