Kombucha vs Kirkland
Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.
Kombucha
Kirkland
The Verdict: Which is Better?
When placing Kombucha and Kirkland side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.
Kombucha is the more energy-dense option here, packing 15 more calories per 100g than Kirkland. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.
However, watch out for the sugar content. Kombucha contains significantly more sugar (3.38g) compared to the milder Kirkland (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Kirkland is undeniably the healthier pick.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is healthier: Kombucha or Kirkland?
It depends on your goals. Kombucha has 14.8 calories, while Kirkland has 0 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.
Is Kombucha vegan?
No, Kombucha is not certified vegan.
What is the calorie difference between Kombucha and Kirkland?
There is a difference of 15 calories per 100g between the two products.
