Head-to-Head Analysis

Kombucha vs Tazo Tea Wild Sweet Orange

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Kombucha

Kombucha

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Tazo Tea Wild Sweet Orange

Tazo Tea Wild Sweet Orange

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
12.7 kcal
Energy
0 kcal
2.1g
Sugars
0g
0g
Fat
0g
0.4g
Protein
0g
0g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Kombucha and Tazo Tea Wild Sweet Orange side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Kombucha is the more energy-dense option here, packing 13 more calories per 100g than Tazo Tea Wild Sweet Orange. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Kombucha contains significantly more sugar (2.1097046413502g) compared to the milder Tazo Tea Wild Sweet Orange (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Tazo Tea Wild Sweet Orange is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Kombucha or Tazo Tea Wild Sweet Orange?

It depends on your goals. Kombucha has 12.658227848101 calories, while Tazo Tea Wild Sweet Orange has 0 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Kombucha vegan?

No, Kombucha is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Kombucha and Tazo Tea Wild Sweet Orange?

There is a difference of 13 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.