Head-to-Head Analysis

kombucha vs Monster Energy Zero Sugar

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of kombucha

kombucha

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Monster Energy Zero Sugar

Monster Energy Zero Sugar

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
30 kcal
Energy
211 kcal
7g
Sugars
0g
0g
Fat
0g
0g
Protein
0g
0g
Salt
20.1g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing kombucha and Monster Energy Zero Sugar side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, kombucha is the clear winner. With 181 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. kombucha contains significantly more sugar (7g) compared to the milder Monster Energy Zero Sugar (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Monster Energy Zero Sugar is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: kombucha or Monster Energy Zero Sugar?

It depends on your goals. kombucha has 30 calories, while Monster Energy Zero Sugar has 211 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is kombucha vegan?

No, kombucha is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between kombucha and Monster Energy Zero Sugar?

There is a difference of 181 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.