Head-to-Head Analysis

Korean Barbecue Fire-Grilled Pork Jerky vs Dill pickle chips

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Korean Barbecue Fire-Grilled Pork Jerky

Korean Barbecue Fire-Grilled Pork Jerky

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Dill pickle chips

Dill pickle chips

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
286 kcal
Energy
535.7 kcal
32.1g
Sugars
0g
1.8g
Fat
32.1g
25g
Protein
3.6g
2.8g
Salt
1.7g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Korean Barbecue Fire-Grilled Pork Jerky and Dill pickle chips side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Korean Barbecue Fire-Grilled Pork Jerky is the clear winner. With 250 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Korean Barbecue Fire-Grilled Pork Jerky contains significantly more sugar (32.1g) compared to the milder Dill pickle chips (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Dill pickle chips is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Korean Barbecue Fire-Grilled Pork Jerky offers a protein boost with 25g per 100g, outperforming Dill pickle chips in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Korean Barbecue Fire-Grilled Pork Jerky or Dill pickle chips?

It depends on your goals. Korean Barbecue Fire-Grilled Pork Jerky has 286 calories, while Dill pickle chips has 535.71428571429 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Korean Barbecue Fire-Grilled Pork Jerky vegan?

No, Korean Barbecue Fire-Grilled Pork Jerky is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Korean Barbecue Fire-Grilled Pork Jerky and Dill pickle chips?

There is a difference of 250 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.