Head-to-Head Analysis

Korean Inspired BBQ Marinated Sliced Beef vs Original Popcorn

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Korean Inspired BBQ Marinated Sliced Beef

Korean Inspired BBQ Marinated Sliced Beef

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Original Popcorn

Original Popcorn

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
159 kcal
Energy
555.6 kcal
10.6g
Sugars
0g
4g
Fat
38.9g
18.5g
Protein
5.6g
4g
Salt
0.7g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Korean Inspired BBQ Marinated Sliced Beef and Original Popcorn side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Korean Inspired BBQ Marinated Sliced Beef is the clear winner. With 397 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Korean Inspired BBQ Marinated Sliced Beef contains significantly more sugar (10.6g) compared to the milder Original Popcorn (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Original Popcorn is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Korean Inspired BBQ Marinated Sliced Beef offers a protein boost with 18.5g per 100g, outperforming Original Popcorn in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Korean Inspired BBQ Marinated Sliced Beef or Original Popcorn?

It depends on your goals. Korean Inspired BBQ Marinated Sliced Beef has 159 calories, while Original Popcorn has 555.55556 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Korean Inspired BBQ Marinated Sliced Beef vegan?

No, Korean Inspired BBQ Marinated Sliced Beef is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Korean Inspired BBQ Marinated Sliced Beef and Original Popcorn?

There is a difference of 397 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.