Head-to-Head Analysis

Korean-Style Fried Chicken vs No Sugar Added Chocolate Wafers

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Korean-Style Fried Chicken

Korean-Style Fried Chicken

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of No Sugar Added Chocolate Wafers

No Sugar Added Chocolate Wafers

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
536 kcal
Energy
480 kcal
3.6g
Sugars
0g
35.7g
Fat
32g
7.1g
Protein
4g
1.3g
Salt
0.4g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Korean-Style Fried Chicken and No Sugar Added Chocolate Wafers side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Korean-Style Fried Chicken is the more energy-dense option here, packing 56 more calories per 100g than No Sugar Added Chocolate Wafers. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Korean-Style Fried Chicken contains significantly more sugar (3.57g) compared to the milder No Sugar Added Chocolate Wafers (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, No Sugar Added Chocolate Wafers is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Korean-Style Fried Chicken offers a protein boost with 7.14g per 100g, outperforming No Sugar Added Chocolate Wafers in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Korean-Style Fried Chicken or No Sugar Added Chocolate Wafers?

It depends on your goals. Korean-Style Fried Chicken has 536 calories, while No Sugar Added Chocolate Wafers has 480 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Korean-Style Fried Chicken vegan?

No, Korean-Style Fried Chicken is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Korean-Style Fried Chicken and No Sugar Added Chocolate Wafers?

There is a difference of 56 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.