Head-to-Head Analysis

krackjack vs Almonds

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of krackjack

krackjack

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Almonds

Almonds

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
489 kcal
Energy
607 kcal
19.6g
Sugars
7.1g
19.9g
Fat
53.6g
6.8g
Protein
21.4g
0.9g
Salt
1g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing krackjack and Almonds side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, krackjack is the clear winner. With 118 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. krackjack contains significantly more sugar (19.6g) compared to the milder Almonds (7.14g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Almonds is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: krackjack or Almonds?

It depends on your goals. krackjack has 489 calories, while Almonds has 607 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is krackjack vegan?

No, krackjack is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between krackjack and Almonds?

There is a difference of 118 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.