Head-to-Head Analysis

Krinkle Cut Potato Chips Dill Pickle vs Santa fe style with chicken salad kit for one

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Krinkle Cut Potato Chips Dill Pickle

Krinkle Cut Potato Chips Dill Pickle

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Santa fe style with chicken salad kit for one

Santa fe style with chicken salad kit for one

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
536 kcal
Energy
141.2 kcal
0g
Sugars
1.8g
32.1g
Fat
9.4g
7.1g
Protein
5.9g
1.1g
Salt
0.6g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Krinkle Cut Potato Chips Dill Pickle and Santa fe style with chicken salad kit for one side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Krinkle Cut Potato Chips Dill Pickle is the more energy-dense option here, packing 395 more calories per 100g than Santa fe style with chicken salad kit for one. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

In terms of sugar control, Krinkle Cut Potato Chips Dill Pickle takes the lead with only 0g of sugar per 100g, whereas Santa fe style with chicken salad kit for one contains 1.76g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Krinkle Cut Potato Chips Dill Pickle or Santa fe style with chicken salad kit for one?

It depends on your goals. Krinkle Cut Potato Chips Dill Pickle has 536 calories, while Santa fe style with chicken salad kit for one has 141.18 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Krinkle Cut Potato Chips Dill Pickle vegan?

No, Krinkle Cut Potato Chips Dill Pickle is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Krinkle Cut Potato Chips Dill Pickle and Santa fe style with chicken salad kit for one?

There is a difference of 395 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.