Kung Pao Chicken vs Sirloin Tender Steak
Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.
Kung Pao Chicken
Sirloin Tender Steak
The Verdict: Which is Better?
When placing Kung Pao Chicken and Sirloin Tender Steak side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.
Kung Pao Chicken is the more energy-dense option here, packing 160 more calories per 100g than Sirloin Tender Steak. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.
However, watch out for the sugar content. Kung Pao Chicken contains significantly more sugar (5.33g) compared to the milder Sirloin Tender Steak (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Sirloin Tender Steak is undeniably the healthier pick.
Looking to build muscle? Kung Pao Chicken offers a protein boost with 16g per 100g, outperforming Sirloin Tender Steak in this category.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is healthier: Kung Pao Chicken or Sirloin Tender Steak?
It depends on your goals. Kung Pao Chicken has 160 calories, while Sirloin Tender Steak has 0 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.
Is Kung Pao Chicken vegan?
No, Kung Pao Chicken is not certified vegan.
What is the calorie difference between Kung Pao Chicken and Sirloin Tender Steak?
There is a difference of 160 calories per 100g between the two products.
