Head-to-Head Analysis

Kuya Arnel's Cooked Sweet Pork Sausage vs Classic Potato Chips

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Kuya Arnel's Cooked Sweet Pork Sausage

Kuya Arnel's Cooked Sweet Pork Sausage

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Classic Potato Chips

Classic Potato Chips

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
268 kcal
Energy
565 kcal
12.5g
Sugars
3.5g
12.5g
Fat
35.3g
14.3g
Protein
7.1g
0.9g
Salt
1.2g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Kuya Arnel's Cooked Sweet Pork Sausage and Classic Potato Chips side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Kuya Arnel's Cooked Sweet Pork Sausage is the clear winner. With 297 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Kuya Arnel's Cooked Sweet Pork Sausage contains significantly more sugar (12.5g) compared to the milder Classic Potato Chips (3.53g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Classic Potato Chips is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Kuya Arnel's Cooked Sweet Pork Sausage offers a protein boost with 14.3g per 100g, outperforming Classic Potato Chips in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Kuya Arnel's Cooked Sweet Pork Sausage or Classic Potato Chips?

It depends on your goals. Kuya Arnel's Cooked Sweet Pork Sausage has 268 calories, while Classic Potato Chips has 565 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Kuya Arnel's Cooked Sweet Pork Sausage vegan?

No, Kuya Arnel's Cooked Sweet Pork Sausage is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Kuya Arnel's Cooked Sweet Pork Sausage and Classic Potato Chips?

There is a difference of 297 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.