Kyllingfilet vs Classic waffle cones
Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.
Kyllingfilet
Classic waffle cones
The Verdict: Which is Better?
When placing Kyllingfilet and Classic waffle cones side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.
For calorie-conscious consumers, Kyllingfilet is the clear winner. With 381 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.
In terms of sugar control, Kyllingfilet takes the lead with only 0g of sugar per 100g, whereas Classic waffle cones contains 28.57g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is healthier: Kyllingfilet or Classic waffle cones?
Kyllingfilet appears to be the healthier option generally, as it has less sugar and fewer calories.
Is Kyllingfilet vegan?
No, Kyllingfilet is not certified vegan.
What is the calorie difference between Kyllingfilet and Classic waffle cones?
There is a difference of 381 calories per 100g between the two products.
