Head-to-Head Analysis

La Chona Al Pastor Pork Sausage vs Dark Chocolate bar with hazelnut and cocoa filling

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of La Chona Al Pastor Pork Sausage

La Chona Al Pastor Pork Sausage

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Dark Chocolate bar with hazelnut and cocoa filling

Dark Chocolate bar with hazelnut and cocoa filling

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
271 kcal
Energy
567 kcal
2.4g
Sugars
36.7g
22.4g
Fat
43.3g
12.9g
Protein
6.7g
2.4g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing La Chona Al Pastor Pork Sausage and Dark Chocolate bar with hazelnut and cocoa filling side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, La Chona Al Pastor Pork Sausage is the clear winner. With 296 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

In terms of sugar control, La Chona Al Pastor Pork Sausage takes the lead with only 2.35g of sugar per 100g, whereas Dark Chocolate bar with hazelnut and cocoa filling contains 36.7g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? La Chona Al Pastor Pork Sausage offers a protein boost with 12.9g per 100g, outperforming Dark Chocolate bar with hazelnut and cocoa filling in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: La Chona Al Pastor Pork Sausage or Dark Chocolate bar with hazelnut and cocoa filling?

La Chona Al Pastor Pork Sausage appears to be the healthier option generally, as it has less sugar and fewer calories.

Is La Chona Al Pastor Pork Sausage vegan?

No, La Chona Al Pastor Pork Sausage is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between La Chona Al Pastor Pork Sausage and Dark Chocolate bar with hazelnut and cocoa filling?

There is a difference of 296 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.