Head-to-Head Analysis

Land o'frost bistro favorites applewood smoked vs Royale, boneless cooked ham

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Land o'frost bistro favorites applewood smoked

Land o'frost bistro favorites applewood smoked

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Royale, boneless cooked ham

Royale, boneless cooked ham

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
134.6 kcal
Energy
143 kcal
1.9g
Sugars
0g
3.8g
Fat
8.9g
17.3g
Protein
16.1g
2.6g
Salt
2.3g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Land o'frost bistro favorites applewood smoked and Royale, boneless cooked ham side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Land o'frost bistro favorites applewood smoked is the clear winner. With 8 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Land o'frost bistro favorites applewood smoked contains significantly more sugar (1.9230769230769g) compared to the milder Royale, boneless cooked ham (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Royale, boneless cooked ham is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Land o'frost bistro favorites applewood smoked or Royale, boneless cooked ham?

It depends on your goals. Land o'frost bistro favorites applewood smoked has 134.61538461538 calories, while Royale, boneless cooked ham has 143 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Land o'frost bistro favorites applewood smoked vegan?

No, Land o'frost bistro favorites applewood smoked is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Land o'frost bistro favorites applewood smoked and Royale, boneless cooked ham?

There is a difference of 8 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.