Head-to-Head Analysis

Land o'frost bistro favorites black forest uncured ham vs Thick Sliced Bacon

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Land o'frost bistro favorites black forest uncured ham

Land o'frost bistro favorites black forest uncured ham

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Thick Sliced Bacon

Thick Sliced Bacon

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
115.4 kcal
Energy
500 kcal
1.9g
Sugars
0g
3.8g
Fat
35.7g
17.3g
Protein
35.7g
2.5g
Salt
5g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Land o'frost bistro favorites black forest uncured ham and Thick Sliced Bacon side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Land o'frost bistro favorites black forest uncured ham is the clear winner. With 385 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Land o'frost bistro favorites black forest uncured ham contains significantly more sugar (1.9230769230769g) compared to the milder Thick Sliced Bacon (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Thick Sliced Bacon is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Land o'frost bistro favorites black forest uncured ham or Thick Sliced Bacon?

It depends on your goals. Land o'frost bistro favorites black forest uncured ham has 115.38461538462 calories, while Thick Sliced Bacon has 500 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Land o'frost bistro favorites black forest uncured ham vegan?

No, Land o'frost bistro favorites black forest uncured ham is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Land o'frost bistro favorites black forest uncured ham and Thick Sliced Bacon?

There is a difference of 385 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.