Head-to-Head Analysis

Land o'frost bistro favorites black forest uncured ham vs Uncured Capocollo

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Land o'frost bistro favorites black forest uncured ham

Land o'frost bistro favorites black forest uncured ham

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Uncured Capocollo

Uncured Capocollo

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
115.4 kcal
Energy
1150 kcal
1.9g
Sugars
0g
3.8g
Fat
76.5g
17.3g
Protein
102g
2.5g
Salt
17.2g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Land o'frost bistro favorites black forest uncured ham and Uncured Capocollo side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Land o'frost bistro favorites black forest uncured ham is the clear winner. With 1035 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Land o'frost bistro favorites black forest uncured ham contains significantly more sugar (1.9230769230769g) compared to the milder Uncured Capocollo (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Uncured Capocollo is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Land o'frost bistro favorites black forest uncured ham or Uncured Capocollo?

It depends on your goals. Land o'frost bistro favorites black forest uncured ham has 115.38461538462 calories, while Uncured Capocollo has 1150 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Land o'frost bistro favorites black forest uncured ham vegan?

No, Land o'frost bistro favorites black forest uncured ham is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Land o'frost bistro favorites black forest uncured ham and Uncured Capocollo?

There is a difference of 1035 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.