Head-to-Head Analysis

Land o lakes, lowfat half and half vs Pillars Drinkable Greek Yogurt Mango

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Land o lakes, lowfat half and half

Land o lakes, lowfat half and half

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Pillars Drinkable Greek Yogurt Mango

Pillars Drinkable Greek Yogurt Mango

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
83 kcal
Energy
29.2 kcal
3.3g
Sugars
1.3g
5g
Fat
0g
3.3g
Protein
6.3g
0.1g
Salt
0.1g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Land o lakes, lowfat half and half and Pillars Drinkable Greek Yogurt Mango side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Land o lakes, lowfat half and half is the more energy-dense option here, packing 54 more calories per 100g than Pillars Drinkable Greek Yogurt Mango. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Land o lakes, lowfat half and half contains significantly more sugar (3.33g) compared to the milder Pillars Drinkable Greek Yogurt Mango (1.25g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Pillars Drinkable Greek Yogurt Mango is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Land o lakes, lowfat half and half or Pillars Drinkable Greek Yogurt Mango?

It depends on your goals. Land o lakes, lowfat half and half has 83 calories, while Pillars Drinkable Greek Yogurt Mango has 29.2 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Land o lakes, lowfat half and half vegan?

No, Land o lakes, lowfat half and half is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Land o lakes, lowfat half and half and Pillars Drinkable Greek Yogurt Mango?

There is a difference of 54 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.