Head-to-Head Analysis

Lasc co smoked atlantic nova salmon vs Skinless & Boneless Sardines In Olive Oil

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Lasc co smoked atlantic nova salmon

Lasc co smoked atlantic nova salmon

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Skinless & Boneless Sardines In Olive Oil

Skinless & Boneless Sardines In Olive Oil

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
193 kcal
Energy
241 kcal
1.8g
Sugars
0g
10.5g
Fat
16.1g
19.3g
Protein
24.1g
2.9g
Salt
0.9g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Lasc co smoked atlantic nova salmon and Skinless & Boneless Sardines In Olive Oil side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Lasc co smoked atlantic nova salmon is the clear winner. With 48 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Lasc co smoked atlantic nova salmon contains significantly more sugar (1.75g) compared to the milder Skinless & Boneless Sardines In Olive Oil (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Skinless & Boneless Sardines In Olive Oil is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Lasc co smoked atlantic nova salmon or Skinless & Boneless Sardines In Olive Oil?

It depends on your goals. Lasc co smoked atlantic nova salmon has 192.98 calories, while Skinless & Boneless Sardines In Olive Oil has 241 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Lasc co smoked atlantic nova salmon vegan?

No, Lasc co smoked atlantic nova salmon is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Lasc co smoked atlantic nova salmon and Skinless & Boneless Sardines In Olive Oil?

There is a difference of 48 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.