Head-to-Head Analysis

Lee kum kee, black bean sauce vs Organic Soy Sauce Substitute original

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Lee kum kee, black bean sauce

Lee kum kee, black bean sauce

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Organic Soy Sauce Substitute original

Organic Soy Sauce Substitute original

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
167 kcal
Energy
120 kcal
11.1g
Sugars
20g
5.6g
Fat
0g
5.6g
Protein
0g
12.2g
Salt
4.5g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Lee kum kee, black bean sauce and Organic Soy Sauce Substitute original side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Lee kum kee, black bean sauce is the more energy-dense option here, packing 47 more calories per 100g than Organic Soy Sauce Substitute original. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

In terms of sugar control, Lee kum kee, black bean sauce takes the lead with only 11.11g of sugar per 100g, whereas Organic Soy Sauce Substitute original contains 20g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? Lee kum kee, black bean sauce offers a protein boost with 5.56g per 100g, outperforming Organic Soy Sauce Substitute original in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Lee kum kee, black bean sauce or Organic Soy Sauce Substitute original?

It depends on your goals. Lee kum kee, black bean sauce has 167 calories, while Organic Soy Sauce Substitute original has 120 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Lee kum kee, black bean sauce vegan?

No, Lee kum kee, black bean sauce is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Lee kum kee, black bean sauce and Organic Soy Sauce Substitute original?

There is a difference of 47 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.