Head-to-Head Analysis

Lemon Blueberry Twice Baked Cookies vs Crisp and thins salt and vinegar chips

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Lemon Blueberry Twice Baked Cookies

Lemon Blueberry Twice Baked Cookies

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Crisp and thins salt and vinegar chips

Crisp and thins salt and vinegar chips

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
357.1 kcal
Energy
433.3 kcal
28.6g
Sugars
3.3g
14.3g
Fat
13.3g
7.1g
Protein
6.7g
0g
Salt
1.7g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Lemon Blueberry Twice Baked Cookies and Crisp and thins salt and vinegar chips side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Lemon Blueberry Twice Baked Cookies is the clear winner. With 76 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Lemon Blueberry Twice Baked Cookies contains significantly more sugar (28.571428571429g) compared to the milder Crisp and thins salt and vinegar chips (3.33g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Crisp and thins salt and vinegar chips is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Lemon Blueberry Twice Baked Cookies or Crisp and thins salt and vinegar chips?

It depends on your goals. Lemon Blueberry Twice Baked Cookies has 357.14285714286 calories, while Crisp and thins salt and vinegar chips has 433.33 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Lemon Blueberry Twice Baked Cookies vegan?

No, Lemon Blueberry Twice Baked Cookies is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Lemon Blueberry Twice Baked Cookies and Crisp and thins salt and vinegar chips?

There is a difference of 76 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.