Head-to-Head Analysis

Less Sodium Teriyaki Marinade & Sauce vs Worcestershire Sauce

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Less Sodium Teriyaki Marinade & Sauce

Less Sodium Teriyaki Marinade & Sauce

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Worcestershire Sauce

Worcestershire Sauce

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
100 kcal
Energy
5 kcal
20g
Sugars
1g
0g
Fat
0g
3g
Protein
0g
2g
Salt
0.2g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Less Sodium Teriyaki Marinade & Sauce and Worcestershire Sauce side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Less Sodium Teriyaki Marinade & Sauce is the more energy-dense option here, packing 95 more calories per 100g than Worcestershire Sauce. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Less Sodium Teriyaki Marinade & Sauce contains significantly more sugar (20g) compared to the milder Worcestershire Sauce (1g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Worcestershire Sauce is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Less Sodium Teriyaki Marinade & Sauce offers a protein boost with 3g per 100g, outperforming Worcestershire Sauce in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Less Sodium Teriyaki Marinade & Sauce or Worcestershire Sauce?

It depends on your goals. Less Sodium Teriyaki Marinade & Sauce has 100 calories, while Worcestershire Sauce has 5 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Less Sodium Teriyaki Marinade & Sauce vegan?

No, Less Sodium Teriyaki Marinade & Sauce is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Less Sodium Teriyaki Marinade & Sauce and Worcestershire Sauce?

There is a difference of 95 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.