Head-to-Head Analysis

Liège-Style Waffle Vermont Maple vs Green Ripe Medium Olives

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Liège-Style Waffle Vermont Maple

Liège-Style Waffle Vermont Maple

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Green Ripe Medium Olives

Green Ripe Medium Olives

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
473 kcal
Energy
100 kcal
30.9g
Sugars
0g
21.8g
Fat
10g
7.3g
Protein
0g
0.7g
Salt
2.3g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Liège-Style Waffle Vermont Maple and Green Ripe Medium Olives side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Liège-Style Waffle Vermont Maple is the more energy-dense option here, packing 373 more calories per 100g than Green Ripe Medium Olives. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Liège-Style Waffle Vermont Maple contains significantly more sugar (30.9g) compared to the milder Green Ripe Medium Olives (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Green Ripe Medium Olives is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Liège-Style Waffle Vermont Maple offers a protein boost with 7.27g per 100g, outperforming Green Ripe Medium Olives in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Liège-Style Waffle Vermont Maple or Green Ripe Medium Olives?

It depends on your goals. Liège-Style Waffle Vermont Maple has 473 calories, while Green Ripe Medium Olives has 100 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Liège-Style Waffle Vermont Maple vegan?

No, Liège-Style Waffle Vermont Maple is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Liège-Style Waffle Vermont Maple and Green Ripe Medium Olives?

There is a difference of 373 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.