Head-to-Head Analysis

Lidl Organic Soy Milk (Original) vs Dark Salted Caramel Rolos

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Lidl Organic Soy Milk (Original)

Lidl Organic Soy Milk (Original)

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Dark Salted Caramel Rolos

Dark Salted Caramel Rolos

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
37.5 kcal
Energy
0 kcal
2.5g
Sugars
0g
3g
Fat
0g
6g
Protein
0g
0g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Lidl Organic Soy Milk (Original) and Dark Salted Caramel Rolos side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Lidl Organic Soy Milk (Original) is the more energy-dense option here, packing 38 more calories per 100g than Dark Salted Caramel Rolos. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Lidl Organic Soy Milk (Original) contains significantly more sugar (2.5g) compared to the milder Dark Salted Caramel Rolos (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Dark Salted Caramel Rolos is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Lidl Organic Soy Milk (Original) offers a protein boost with 6g per 100g, outperforming Dark Salted Caramel Rolos in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Lidl Organic Soy Milk (Original) or Dark Salted Caramel Rolos?

It depends on your goals. Lidl Organic Soy Milk (Original) has 37.5 calories, while Dark Salted Caramel Rolos has 0 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Lidl Organic Soy Milk (Original) vegan?

No, Lidl Organic Soy Milk (Original) is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Lidl Organic Soy Milk (Original) and Dark Salted Caramel Rolos?

There is a difference of 38 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.