Head-to-Head Analysis

Life multigrain cereal original vs Protein & Nutmilk Almond & Cashew Chocolate

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Life multigrain cereal original

Life multigrain cereal original

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Protein & Nutmilk Almond & Cashew Chocolate

Protein & Nutmilk Almond & Cashew Chocolate

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
381 kcal
Energy
150 kcal
19g
Sugars
14g
4.8g
Fat
5g
9.5g
Protein
10g
1g
Salt
0.4g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Life multigrain cereal original and Protein & Nutmilk Almond & Cashew Chocolate side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Life multigrain cereal original is the more energy-dense option here, packing 231 more calories per 100g than Protein & Nutmilk Almond & Cashew Chocolate. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Life multigrain cereal original contains significantly more sugar (19g) compared to the milder Protein & Nutmilk Almond & Cashew Chocolate (14g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Protein & Nutmilk Almond & Cashew Chocolate is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Life multigrain cereal original or Protein & Nutmilk Almond & Cashew Chocolate?

It depends on your goals. Life multigrain cereal original has 381 calories, while Protein & Nutmilk Almond & Cashew Chocolate has 150 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Life multigrain cereal original vegan?

No, Life multigrain cereal original is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Life multigrain cereal original and Protein & Nutmilk Almond & Cashew Chocolate?

There is a difference of 231 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.