Head-to-Head Analysis

Lifesavers vs 0207 Sante 72% Cacao Dark Chocolate Made With Coconut Sugar Baking Chips

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Lifesavers

Lifesavers

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of 0207 Sante 72% Cacao Dark Chocolate Made With Coconut Sugar Baking Chips

0207 Sante 72% Cacao Dark Chocolate Made With Coconut Sugar Baking Chips

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
89.9 kcal
Energy
533 kcal
18g
Sugars
13.3g
0g
Fat
46.7g
1g
Protein
6.7g
0g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Lifesavers and 0207 Sante 72% Cacao Dark Chocolate Made With Coconut Sugar Baking Chips side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Lifesavers is the clear winner. With 443 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Lifesavers contains significantly more sugar (18g) compared to the milder 0207 Sante 72% Cacao Dark Chocolate Made With Coconut Sugar Baking Chips (13.3g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, 0207 Sante 72% Cacao Dark Chocolate Made With Coconut Sugar Baking Chips is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Lifesavers or 0207 Sante 72% Cacao Dark Chocolate Made With Coconut Sugar Baking Chips?

It depends on your goals. Lifesavers has 89.9 calories, while 0207 Sante 72% Cacao Dark Chocolate Made With Coconut Sugar Baking Chips has 533 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Lifesavers vegan?

No, Lifesavers is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Lifesavers and 0207 Sante 72% Cacao Dark Chocolate Made With Coconut Sugar Baking Chips?

There is a difference of 443 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.