Head-to-Head Analysis

Light & fit calorie packs strawberry blueberry vs King Size KitKat

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Light & fit calorie packs strawberry blueberry

Light & fit calorie packs strawberry blueberry

Not Vegan
VS
Package of King Size KitKat

King Size KitKat

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
44.2 kcal
Energy
500 kcal
5.3g
Sugars
53.1g
0g
Fat
25g
2.7g
Protein
3.1g
0.1g
Salt
0.1g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Light & fit calorie packs strawberry blueberry and King Size KitKat side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Light & fit calorie packs strawberry blueberry is the clear winner. With 456 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

In terms of sugar control, Light & fit calorie packs strawberry blueberry takes the lead with only 5.3097345132743g of sugar per 100g, whereas King Size KitKat contains 53.1g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Light & fit calorie packs strawberry blueberry or King Size KitKat?

Light & fit calorie packs strawberry blueberry appears to be the healthier option generally, as it has less sugar and fewer calories.

Is Light & fit calorie packs strawberry blueberry vegan?

No, Light & fit calorie packs strawberry blueberry is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Light & fit calorie packs strawberry blueberry and King Size KitKat?

There is a difference of 456 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.