Head-to-Head Analysis

Light Raspberry Walnut Vinaigrette Dressing vs Mild green enchilada sauce

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Light Raspberry Walnut Vinaigrette Dressing

Light Raspberry Walnut Vinaigrette Dressing

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Mild green enchilada sauce

Mild green enchilada sauce

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
233.3 kcal
Energy
41.7 kcal
13.3g
Sugars
1.7g
13.3g
Fat
1.7g
0g
Protein
0g
2.5g
Salt
1.4g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Light Raspberry Walnut Vinaigrette Dressing and Mild green enchilada sauce side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Light Raspberry Walnut Vinaigrette Dressing is the more energy-dense option here, packing 192 more calories per 100g than Mild green enchilada sauce. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Light Raspberry Walnut Vinaigrette Dressing contains significantly more sugar (13.33g) compared to the milder Mild green enchilada sauce (1.67g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Mild green enchilada sauce is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Light Raspberry Walnut Vinaigrette Dressing or Mild green enchilada sauce?

It depends on your goals. Light Raspberry Walnut Vinaigrette Dressing has 233.33 calories, while Mild green enchilada sauce has 41.67 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Light Raspberry Walnut Vinaigrette Dressing vegan?

No, Light Raspberry Walnut Vinaigrette Dressing is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Light Raspberry Walnut Vinaigrette Dressing and Mild green enchilada sauce?

There is a difference of 192 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.